Log in

THE CHATTERBOX: Das Sporking - The Sporkings of Das Mervin and Company

> Recent Entries
> Archive
> Friends
> Profile

TOC Posting Format
Spork Suggestion Box
Das Mervin's FAQ
Sporker FAQs
Chatterbox Forum
Das Sporking Tag List
Sue Assassins
SOS Sporkers
Kippur Critiques
The ShinRa High Sporking

January 10th, 2013

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
02:37 am - THE CHATTERBOX: Das Sporking
The Chatterbox: Das Sporking

As the community owner and mod, I am always looking for ways to improve the comm. As such, this is where you can talk about the comm itself—do you have suggestions? Compliments? Criticisms? Ideas for a new Chatterbox subject? Or even just want to say how you found this place or places you’ve seen the comm linked? You can bring it here and mention it.

(123 comments | Leave a comment)


[User Picture]
Date:January 12th, 2013 03:48 pm (UTC)

Re: Indeed.

The one I remember specifically was a part in the third story, where contrived circumstances leave the Sue girls, a child who is roughly six or seven, and an infant locked in a dungeon. Their captors, clutching firmly to the villain ball, only feed them horrible food, and it turns out that the infant will only breastfeed (of course). So the one Sue girl uses her powers to somehow make the other Sue girl's boobs grow huge, so she can breastfeed the kid. The infant was... slightly more understandable (I know some kids can need specific diets), but then she uses her new erm, acquisitions to feed the SIX-YEAR-OLD. Who ought to be old enough to eat the solid food, even if it isn't very tasty.

Several reviewers pointed out how they found that a bit much. Neil's response was a rather condescending three-parter:

1.) It wasn't supposed to be seen as sexual, but a loving gesture to save the children (just...no. Trust me.)

2.) Of COURSE they didn't take the most logical course of action! They weren't thinking rationally! (Never mind that they didn't *act* like they were panicked or otherwise thinking irrationally, or that they had to "logic" out the plan they did use)

3.) He didn't see anything perverted at all about breastfeeding a six-year-old. If you did so, it meant that you were the one with a filthy mind. (He trotted this one out a LOT when people tried to call him out on his squicky sexual stuff.)

Oh, and the other one I can think of is a scene where two of the Sue girls (who are about twelve and eleven and are adopted sisters) decide to perform oral sex on each other. Pretty much went the same way. Several fans said that they found that a bit much, and his response was along the lines are "I don't know what you're talking about! There's absolutely nothing perverted about preteen adopted sisters doing those sorts of things together! It's meant to be a sign of their sisterly love and affection and if you think it's sexual, you've got a dirty mind."
[User Picture]
Date:January 12th, 2013 04:43 pm (UTC)

Re: Indeed.

Yeah, I could see having to breast-feed the infant, especially if s/he was not yet accustomed to solids, but a six year old? Yeah...no. There comes a point where you have to remove baby from 'Mommy's' tit and let her/him try new things.

No, sisterly love and affection would be doing each others hair while having meaningless gossip about nothing. (Or so I'd imagine, I grew up with one brother and no sisters). It would not involve auditioning for Child Porn, the Movie.
[User Picture]
Date:January 12th, 2013 08:08 pm (UTC)

Re: Indeed.

Given that you can go three weeks without food, I have to ask how "yucky" the water was (although to be fair, a bunch of young girls probably wouldn't know their hunger isn't as big a problem as it seems).

I knew a guy online who wrote a Tenchi fanfic with a similar idea (sans the pedophilia, since the youngest person was 17), only he was smart enough to have it make sense. It was actually well written. Relatively tasteful, despite the fetish involved.

> Go to Top